Libertarians

  • Liberalism 5.0?, Part 2

    Last week I posted about Walter Russell Mead's article "The Once and Future Liberalism." There is much in it I like, and I think he is correct when he attributes the political impasse that we are in to a futile argument between "conservatives"–Liberal 4.1 types (i.e., New Deal/Great Society Democrats) and reactionaries– Liberal 3.0 types,

    read more

  • Finding the Balance between Centralization and Localism I

    I was listening to something the other day, and the guy was making a point I had never considered.  Empires for the most part, whether ancient or modern, are not particularly intrusive regarding local cultures and customs. Empires more often than not live with local cultural pluralism so long as locals pay their taxes and

    read more

  • Liberalism 5.0?

    The core institutions, ideas and expectations that shaped American life for the sixty years after the New Deal don’t work anymore. The gaps between the social system we inhabit and the one we now need are becoming so wide that we can no longer paper over them. But even as the failures of the old

    read more

  • Michael Lind on Realignment

    Michael Lind this afternoon in a post on Salon: When party systems collapse in American history, the new party system tends to emerge from within the dominant party.  The defeat of the Confederates meant that the politics of the Gilded Age would be fought between the business and farmer wings of the hegemonic Republican Party. 

    read more

  • Tom Frank on Fizzling Protests

    From a Salon Interview: Occupy once looked like it could play that role. Certainly the focus on income inequality and the concept of the 99 percent never would have resonated without their hard work. And it just … It sort of fizzled. That was a real shame. I was real excited about it at first. There was

    read more

  • Quarreling with Liberalism

    My loathing for what the GOP has come to represent is about as intense as it could possibly be, but my criticism does not come from the standpoint of Liberalism. I came across this quote from Louis Menand's essay "Christopher Lasch's Quarrel with Liberalism", and it serves as an introduction to what I want to

    read more

  • The Freedom Paradox

    In contemporary Libertarian America, freedom is a question mainly of multiplying choices, the more the better. Freedom is a question of being unshackled from any restriction. Liberation is understood as the unrestricted pursuit of any compulsion, so long as it does not harm others. From the Christian point of view, nothing could be cruder or

    read more

  • Eric Alterman & the Progressive Future

    The American political system is nothing if not complicated and so too are the reasons for its myriad points of democratic dysfunction. Some are endemic to our constitutional regime and all but impossible to address save by the extremely cumbersome (and profoundly unlikely) prospect of amending the Constitution. Others are the result of a corrupt

    read more

  • Some Thoughts on the Fourth of July 2010

    Readers here know that I have a Whiggish view of history.  It's not the cool position to take because it could be characterized as a celebration of mostly dead, rich, white guys, so historians like the Beards and Howard Zinn would tell me I have it all wrong. Nor is it a particularly intellectually respectable

    read more

  • Deneen’s Two Cents

    I came across this recent talk entitled “Sensus Communis and Nature’s Law: Why Communities Know Natural Law Better Than Philosophers” given by Patrick Deneen at a conference at Princeton. It supports Mike McG's dissent to my posts about the perils of allowing our social lattices to disintegrate and why kids' attitudes, and those of society

    read more